This blog is totally independent, unpaid and has only three major objectives.
The first is to inform readers of news and happenings in the e-Health domain, both here in Australia and world-wide.
The second is to provide commentary on e-Health in Australia and to foster improvement where I can.
The third is to encourage discussion of the matters raised in the blog so hopefully readers can get a balanced view of what is really happening and what successes are being achieved.
Health Informatics Society of Australia (HISA) MELBOURNE
Monday 25 JULY 2016 4.00 p.m.
Dr Pradeep Philip - Chair, HIC 2016 and CEO of LaunchVIC
Dr David Hansen – Chair of HISA and CEO, The Australian E-Health Research Centre Distinguished speakers and guests
I am very pleased to again attend this HISA (pronounced High-zar) conference.
This is a premium event for everyone in the rapidly expanding Australian health informatics and digital health community.
In the year since the last HIC conference, the Australian Government has achieved a lot in this space. I’m not just pleased I am excited by how much progress we have made.
I am privileged to be continuing as Health Minister in the government which is re-booting and revamping the digital health system to make it work for everyone.
I’m proud to be part of the Government’s push to move health, along with other parts of our economy, into the 21st century.
This is the age of information technology. It’s helping to make our lives better in so many areas – it’s beyond time for us to let digital technology help us to better health.
We are well on our way now… But we still have much to do in terms of gathering, analysing, sharing and acting on health information and data.
It will be a game changer. It will enable us as health consumers to become more active in managing our health, and will provide coherent links between the multiple services that so many of us now need.
And at the local, regional, national and global levels, will enable much improved monitoring and analysis of population health and trends.
HISA has long recognised this and promoted this message – you have led the way.
Like most of you, I am quite passionate about harnessing the potential of this technology to support and benefit the health of Australians.
The last time I was here I told you about some of the important work that the Government was planning in the My Health Record space.
We’ve done what we promised. Finally, we are on track to have a really functional, national system for consumers to electronically manage and share their health information with their healthcare providers.
Many of you provided input into the review into of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record system. And we listened.
We have supported all of the recommendations and have already adopted most of them to substantially improve the system.
We provided the funding for the changes and to continue to operate the system. We’ve changed the name.
The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record, or the PCEHR which some of you pronounced as the “pecker”, is now simply My Health Record. It’s a lot easier to say, a lot more consumer friendly. It is what it says.
There have been many changes to the My Health Record system to improve the usability. The most recent work allows the system to work in a mobile friendly way, and it works with all smartphones and tablets.
Last year I announced that we would put the power in the hands of health consumers to decide who or what services they can share their My Health Record information with.
I’m pleased to now announce that in late June 2016, the My Health Record was established as a mobile accessible platform. This allows app developers to get on with the innovation to turn this data into useful advice and information for consumers and healthcare providers.
The APIs to support app developers connecting to the My Health Record to access and upload information is now available.
This is a great first step in the open innovation space that we need to do more of.
Consumers, Clinicians, Connectivity, Community – the theme for this conference – is a good summary of what My Health Record is all about.
In any one week, one in three Australian GPs will see a patient for whom they have little or no health information at all. More than one in five GPs faces this situation every day.
With My Health Record, any healthcare provider finding themselves in this situation will have access to at least some information about their patient.
This is the national system that we need, underpinned by strict privacy regulations and access controls in the hands of the consumer.
It will empower health consumers, inform clinicians and connect our often fragmented health system for patients. More Australians and more doctors are now using the system, and we still need more to reach a critical mass.
My Health Record Participation Trials
Four trials are currently underway in different parts of Australia on ways to increase consumer and provider participation, and the value of sharing health information.
The trials will run until the end of October 2016.They will then be assessed by an independent evaluator. Obviously, I will be very interested in the results. The trials will provide the evidence base on which the Government can make the next big decisions on My Health Record.
I expect that to happen in the first half of next year (2017).
Two of the trials, one in Northern Queensland and the other in the Nepean Blue Mountains area of NSW, are trialling opt-out participation.
People living in these regions had a My Health Record automatically created for them, unless they told us they didn’t want one and opted out.
The results were very clear.
Just 1.9 per cent of eligible people across both regions – less than one in 50 – chose to opt out. That’s in line with international experience so it is not a surprise but still very valuable information.
It means that the two trials have resulted in more than 970,000 newly registered My Health Records.
All of the people who got My Health Records through the trials had the opportunity to access their record and add their personal information.
They also set access controls and could elect to receive SMS or email notifications when their My Health Record is accessed by a healthcare provider.
These new My Health Records have been available to their registered healthcare providers since mid July.
I look forward to the results of these trials which are expected to show how the providers engage with and use the My Health Record system.
Two other trials are using different approaches to encourage individuals and healthcare providers to use My Health Record under the current opt-in arrangements.
In Victoria, all patients admitted to Ballarat Hospital are offered assistance to register for a My Health Record. If they agree, their discharge summary is uploaded to their My Health Record when they leave hospital.
GPs and other healthcare providers around Ballarat have been contacted and made aware that the discharge summaries are available on their patients’ My Health Record.
The Western Australia trial is targeted to chronically ill patients and their healthcare providers.
General practices participating in the trial are prompted to register their chronically ill patients for a My Health Record when they establish or maintain care plans for them in chronic disease management software. The software is accessible to all providers involved in the co-ordinated care.
The trial also provides My Health Record functionality to healthcare professionals who would otherwise have been unable to access the system because they didn’t have the right software, or their practice was not registered with My Health Record.
Having doctors and other health professionals using and gaining value from the system is where the real benefits will be realised.
For this reason, earlier this year I made changes to the Practice Incentives Program eHealth Incentive - ePIP – which provides payments to general practices for continuing to adopt and use eHealth.
Since 2012 the ePIP Incentive has been given to GPs to become “My Health Record ready”. We need more than that from general practice now.
From May to July 2016 general practices will only receive the ePIP payment if they upload a certain number of Shared Health Summaries to their patients’ My Health Records.
It’s not a big ask – an average of about five Shared Health Summaries per full-time GP, per quarter.
The Government has also communicated directly to GPs about My Health Record; we have provided online self-paced training, and the 31 Primary Health Networks across Australia are providing training and support to GPs in how to use the system.
I’m very pleased to report that this combined approach is working.
In April this year, around 2,000 patient summaries were being uploaded by doctors each week. Now, in the week ending July 17, it was over 16,000 uploads.
That’s real progress.
We have also established the Australian Digital Health Agency, which began operations at the start of this month (1 July 2016). It’s chaired by Jim Birch AM – I understand he’ll be addressing you on Wednesday.
The Agency is governed by a Board with membership comprising a broad range of skills reflecting the health community.
It is a statutory authority, and is funded by and reports to state and territory Health Ministers through the COAG Health Council.
The Agency draws together activities and resources from NEHTA [National eHealth Transition Authority] and from within my department.
While the department remains responsible for national digital health policy the Agency provides a single, transparent and streamlined governance arrangement for national digital health strategy and operations.
It has a whole-of- system, integrated and strategic approach to digital health services, a focus on clinical quality and safety, and real engagement and collaboration with consumers, healthcare providers and industry.
The Agency will continue to develop the national technical and data standards, and set and promote clear principles for interoperability and open source development.
It’s leading the next stages of consultation to finalise the National Digital Health Strategy – setting out the shared vision for digital health innovation to drive better healthcare delivery and outcomes over the next three years.
In the short to medium term, priorities for the Agency include enabling secure point to point messaging between all healthcare providers, increasing use of My Health Record in public and private hospitals, and upload of pathology and diagnostic imaging reports for patients to their record.
The Agency will be establishing an open innovation capability which will level the playing field for technologists and innovators. This will build on the early work done to make the My Health Record accessible, and will draw on partnering arrangements with other open innovation platforms supported by the Government.
It will also be involved closely with the trial and implementation of Health Care Homes – a crucial element in the Government’s reforms to primary health care.
Primary health care reform
Health Care Homes will improve co-ordination, management and support for people with chronic conditions. The concept is not new – it’s known in the US as the Medical Home or Patient Centred Medical Home.
Health Care Homes will initially be trialled over two years in seven Primary Health Network regions across Australia, starting in July next year.
Up to 200 general practices and Aboriginal Medical Services and up to 65,000 patients will take part. Expressions of interest from practices in the trial regions will be taken later this year.
The trial will be limited to Medicare-eligible patients with two or more complex or chronic conditions. The GP practice they choose as their Health Care Home will tailor care packages for them and simplify the process of managing their varied health needs.
The aim is to provide better, coordinated patient management – to keep them healthy and out of hospital. My Health Record will be essential to the operation of Health Care Homes.
It will be a key connector – allowing the patient and all members of the patient’s health care team to work in constant consultation with each other and to easily share information on medications, treatments, allergies, care plans and so on.
Being able to see the clinical decisions of other healthcare providers will mean better diagnosis and treatment decisions, better care for patients, and will support patients to take greater control of their own health.
The use of My Health Record in the operation of Health Care Homes is a good example of the synergy between better use of digital technology and better health care.
It will reduce frustrating duplication of tests and treatments, make the whole system more efficient and help patients to learn more about their health.
With over 3.9 million Australians now having a My Health Record, we will also see these benefits increasingly through other digital innovations and services – such as remote health monitoring, telehealth, and medication management technologies.
Embracing digital technology and primary care reform will put Australia on the path to better health.
How we receive our health care and monitor its success will continue to evolve with new initiatives, technologies and digital services.
Innovation will continue at a fast pace.
The Australian Government is working to ensure that our health system becomes digitally enabled and connected, and can continue to keep up with technological advances.
The Australian Digital Health Agency will work with the public and private sectors to deliver new complementary products and services to leverage off the national digital health infrastructure.
Today we are embracing mobile technology, apps, and trackers.
Tomorrow it could be artificial intelligence, precision medicines, tailored and personalised technologies as well as implantables.
It’s all very exciting.
I look forward to engaging with you more and learning more about the news from HIC 2016 as it unfolds.
Essentially what the Minister is saying is we have spent the $1B+ on this myHR and now we want it used, and so we are now going to trial the concept of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) – assuming that the myHR is suitable as the IT Infrastructure – along I presume with the GP Practice Systems.
A quick look at the US experience reveals – after more than five years of well-funded trials – reveals that the benefits case for implementation is still less than proven, but that in some circumstances the PCMH does offer some clinical and financial benefits but that the set up costs are pretty high.
As far as the IT that is needed here is a brief summary from experience.
Using Health IT to Support the Patient-Centered Medical Home
The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model is such a successful initiative because it puts the patient-provider relationship at the core of a data-driven, coordinated care continuum. Providers interested in achieving PCMH recognition must rely on a multi-faceted health IT infrastructure complete with robust population health management capabilities, health information exchange, and open communication between patients and staff.
Assuming the healthcare organization has already taken the step of implementing basic EHR technology, the PCMH model requires providers to leverage health IT in several key areas that support patient-centric care. A healthcare organization striving for the upper levels of PCMH recognition must be able to use patient registries, risk stratification tools, health information exchange, and clinical analytics to provide services, assess their progress, and continually improve care quality.
The average practice needs an extra $100,000 a year in funding to implement the Health Care Homes model otherwise it will fail, the RACGP has warned.
This is the first time a practice-level figure has been placed on the cost of the scheme, which was announced by Health Minister Sussan Ley in March as one of the biggest reforms of Medicare in 30 years.
The college issued the figure in response to news that no new money would be made available by the government for the program, above the $21.3 million pledged to pay for IT, infrastructure and training.
Instead, the Department of Health will pay for care administered under the scheme by allocating $93 million over two years (2017/18 and 2018/19), generated by “targeting and alignment of existing healthcare resources”, such as chronic disease items.
The college says this is just a case "shifting [money] from one shrinking pot into another".
All in all I suspect Minister Ley is hoping that before the outcomes of all this are available she will have a new portfolio and someone else will have to pick up the mess. Ms Roxon and Ms Plibersek both avoided being blamed for the PCEHR! All this just looks like a Minister who is conducting trials with known outcomes while just ignoring other and possibly better alternatives
Read the speech closely and see just how realistic and practical you think Ms Ley’s comments are!
Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
Research still underway shows that congestive heart failure patients using a patient portal offered by a hospital or physician practice have higher engagement rates, lower hospitalization and readmission rates, and higher outpatient visit rates.
Use of portals is associated with 20 percent lower hospital admissions and a similar lower rate of readmissions, said Indranil Bardhan, a professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, during a session at Health Data Management’s Healthcare Analytics Symposium in Chicago.
The higher rate of outpatient visits is a positive sign, Bardhan adds. While utilization grows, patients who get more outpatient treatment are less likely to have hospitalizations or readmissions.
More than 90 percent of hospitals across the country make patients’ medical record available online, according toa new report from the American Hospital Association.
Most of them also make it possible for patients to perform related tasks, such as download information, request changes and send referral summaries to third parties.
AHA found progress in these realms. The 92 percent hospitals that make it possible for patients to view medical records, in fact, more than doubled since 2013, when 43 percent of hospitals offered that capability.
Sir David Dalton has called for a radical shake-up in the way that NHS IT is bought and deployed in a health select committee report that warns the NHS is facing a "colossal" financial challenge.
As part of an inquiry into the impact of last year’s spending review on health and care, MPs visited Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, where chief executive Sir David told them that technology was a “key enabler of successful transformation”.
There’s been a lot of hoopla about the role of electronic health records in patient safety, Meaningful Use, data sharing and security.
But the elephant in the room is always "do EHRs provide a good return on investment? Will EHR users make more money?" It seems, based on recent research, that the answer might be yes.
First, there’s the study that EHRs are adept at increasing a provider’s charge capture. By using their EHR’s automation and enhanced coding capability, pediatric primary care physicians saw an $11.49 increase on average, per-patient collections and an $11.09 increase on average, per-patient charges, as well as an improvement in collection ratios. The researchers determined that the increases were due to more orders for ancillary services, improved documentation, forced completion of records and reduced coding errors. They concluded that the investment in EHRs would be recouped.
The threat of ransomware attacks on health care facilities is greater than ever as cybercriminals see the opportunity to make money by encrypting health data in EHRs and demanding payment to unlock it.
CIOs and CISOs, meanwhile, understand that security tools are only one piece of the puzzle when it comes to safeguarding patient data. Another critical aspect not to overlook, of course, is user training.
“While preventing all ransomware attacks is not possible, there are a number of steps healthcare organizations can take to reduce their risk as well as mitigate potential harm,” according to Dean Sittig and Hardeep Singh, MD.
A new analysis of information technology spending at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Veterans Affairs and Defense Health Agency shows that, even despite sequestration, IT services for federal health agencies are up 27 percent annually.
HHS – most notably the sprawling Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services – was far and away the biggest spender, doling out some $13 billion in prime contract obligations between fiscal years 2011 and 2015, according to a report by market research firm Govini.
The Defense Health Agency is also making waves, of course, with its mammoth electronic health record modernization program, which awarded an initial $4.3 billion contract to Leidos, Cerner and Accenture almost exactly a year ago.
A movement is needed to “break open” how patient data can be collected and used, and patients can no longer be passive players when it comes to their personal information, according to John T. Wilbanks and Eric Topol.
Silicon Valley’s role in healthcare is changing rapidly, and more healthcare experts are moving out West to bring their expertise to companies like Google and IBM. These companies can collect giant amounts of data in minutes, and can control how that data is used, Wilbanks, M.D., chief commons officer at Sage Bionetworks, and Topol, a cardiologist and director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute, write in a commentary for Nature.
That, they say, can cause digital profiling, which could increase pre-existing biases.
Makers of inhalers to treat asthma and chronic lung disease are racing to develop a new generation of smart devices with sensors to monitor if patients are using their puffers properly.
Linked wirelessly to the cloud, the gadgets are part of a medical "Internet of Things" that promises improved adherence, or correct use of the medication, and better health outcomes. They may also hold the key to company profits in an era of increasingly tough competition.
Drugmakers believe giving patients and doctors the ability to check inhaler use in this way could be a big help in proving the value of their medicines to governments and insurers, though they need to tread carefully on data privacy.
Research shows that patients at advanced EHR use hospitals cost on average $730 less than those at other hospitals.
Advanced EHR use may lead to significant per patient savings, showing promise for an eventual return on investment, shows a study published in the American Journal of Managed Care.
The study included a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the HIMSS Annual Survey to examine patient costs and rates of advanced EHR use.
For the purposes of the study, the researchers defined advanced EHR use as meaningful use. Those that achieved the benchmarks set forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ EHR Incentive Programs were categorized as advanced EHR users.
Chances are good someone close to you is suffering from a mental health disorder right now. You may not know it.
Chances are also good that you don't have the knowledge or resources to deal with an extended bout of mental illness suffered by a family member. This was a primary concern in the recent passage by the House of the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act, which seeks to overhaul the American mental health care system and awaits companion Senate legislation.
New laws that fund more treatment will be helpful, to be sure, but the Helping Families Act will probably be more initial salvo than decisive blow, given what the nation is up against when it comes to mental illness. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that 25 percent of Americans have a mental illness, and almost 50 percent will face at least one mental health challenge at some point in their lives. The Department of Health and Human Services says 8 percent of Americans could benefit from drug or alcohol treatment.
Thousands of times a year, the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services resolves complaints about possible violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act quietly, outside public view.
This story first appeared July 22, 2016 on the Charles Ornstein ProPublica website.
When the federal government takes the rare step of fining medical providers for violating the privacy and security of patients' medical information, it issues a press release and posts details on the web.
But thousands of times a year, the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services resolves complaints about possible violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act quietly, outside public view. It sends letters reminding providers of their legal obligations, advising them on how to fix purported problems, and, sometimes, prodding them to make voluntary changes.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has sent a report to Congress detailing the lack of clear guidance around the privacy and security of electronic health information collected, shared, and used by entities not currently covered by HIPAA.
Developed in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights and the Federal Trade Commission, the ONC report focuses on mobile health technologies and health social media that are outside the scope of HIPAA.
The report identifies key gaps in oversight that exist between HIPAA regulated and non-regulated entities when it comes to health data, and recommends filling those gaps in a way that protects consumers “while leveling the playing field for innovators inside and outside of HIPAA.”
William Yasnoff, MD, has developed a personal grid format that can prevent hackers from accessing an entire database full of patient records. Hospitals or IT vendors can use the tactic – for free – to force cybercriminals to decrypt one record at a time.
Longtime healthcare and technology veteran William Yasnoff, MD, has created a personal grid tactic for tuning relational databases to make it harder for hackers to steal large sets of medical records.
And Yasnoff, a managing partner at NHII Advisors, said that hospital CIOs and CISOs or technology vendors can use the personal grid approach for free. It’s not a product but, rather, a methodology for organizing data within a traditional relational database management system.
“Large-scale security problems – Anthem and Premara and so on – concern the loss of an entire data set with one intrusion,” said Yasnoff, also an adjunct professor of health sciences informatics at Johns Hopkins University and a member of the team that led the work at the Department of Health and Human Services that resulted in the executive order creating the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
Hospitals are doing a better job than ever of providing patients with the ability to access their electronic records, according to a new report from the American Hospital Association (AHA).
Almost all hospitals (92 percent) offered patients the ability to view their EHRs in 2015, up from 43 percent in 2013. Eighty-four percent allowed patients to download data from their EHR, up from 30 percent in 2013, while more than two-thirds (70 percent) allowed an electronic referral summary to be sent to a third party, an increase from 13 percent in 2013.
New research finds that use of data-driven parameters to modify and reduce alarm limits is one viable option for cutting alarm fatigue, which regularly is cited as a top healthcare hazard.
The study, published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine, focuses on alarm use for hospitalized children at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford.
The facility’s electronic health record system was accessed to find vital sign measurements for heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) for patients. The researchers then analyzed rapid response team and cardiorespiratory arrest events over the course of a year, using HR and RR values before the event to find the number of patients with out-of-range vitals.
More than 90% of patients surveyed followed preoperative protocols to prevent surgical site infections. Researchers believe this inexpensive strategy will reduce SSIs.
A common sense-based by medical students at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis provides a good example of the benefits of patient engagement.
The research, led by second-year students Michelle Keyin Lu and Christopher Chermside-Scabbo, looked at patient engagement as a tool in reducing surgical site infection. It is the third most common healthcare-associated infection, adversely affecting more than 500,000 patients each year.
Fueled by three important trends, the time has come for healthcare to embrace telehealth as a technology platform for achieving increased industry efficiencies and providing greater patient access to care.
So argue Eric Topol, MD, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla, Calif., and Ray Dorsey, MD,director of the Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics at the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, N.Y.
Writing last week in the New England Journal of Medicine, Topol and Dorsey contend in a review article that telemedicine has reached a tipping point and has the potential to dramatically transform the delivery of healthcare for millions of Americans. Thanks to three trends, the authors make the case that the widespread adoption of telehealth is rapidly approaching, especially given the ongoing doctor shortage and the industry’s growing burden of managing chronic diseases.
In a recent interview with STAT, Topol, who serves as director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute (STSI), says the data will help to improve prevention and treatment efforts on a much more personalized level. He calls current testing “a profound waste” that proliferates “one-size-fits-all” efforts.
“This is a new day,” Topol says. “This is a reset, a reboot of what we thought about medicine, and it’s all predicated on what we know about individual people.”
"The apps that these challenges will produce have the potential to spur real-world improvements for individuals and clinicians throughout the health system," said Principal Deputy National Coordinator Vindell Washington, MD.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology announced Monday the Phase 1 winners of two app challenges that aim to make it easier for patients and providers to access and share healthcare data.
Applicants were tasked to use HL7's Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources specification and open application programming interfaces to develop apps that enable more robust data sharing than exists in most electronic health records.
“As a picture of the future state, this guidance provides an important window into how interoperable EHRs and electronic data capture systems or electronic case reporting forms could be leveraged to simplify data collection, reduce errors and provide healthcare professionals new opportunity to treat emerging issues that arise as part of investigations,” writes AMIA President & CEO Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD, and Board Chair Thomas Payne, MD. “However, we strongly caution FDA from assuming that most EHRs are readily configurable for clinical investigations, even among more advanced institutions.”
The use of electronic health records for clinical research offers great opportunities to facilitate medical research but there’s a long road ahead before digital records can reliably used for that purpose.
That’s the warning of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), which yesterday filed comments responding to the Food and Drug Administration’s proposed guidance on using EHRs for research purposes.
Both hospitals and physicians are gathering large amounts of information through the electronic records systems they’ve installed in recent years, AMIA noted. But the professional association, which represents the nation’s leading biomedical and clinical informaticians, said it doubted whether those systems contain data of high enough quality that could support randomized controlled trials.
The first open application programming interface (API) software platform has been certified using HL7’s emerging Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard to meet Stage 3 Meaningful Use interoperability requirements.
This distinction belongs to OpenAPI from Carefluence, a Michigan-based company that offers software solutions and technology integration services to electronic health record vendors and healthcare providers.
Drummond Group, which is authorized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT to test software for compliance with Meaningful Use interoperability requirements, has certified that the Carefluence OpenAPI software module can be deployed alongside existing EHR systems, providing functionality that enables open access to EHRs and lets providers receive incentive payments from the federal government.
Ponemon Insitutue founder Larry Ponemon said that even though leaders understand threats, hospitals continue to struggle with implementing effective defenses.
Top executives in charge of cybersecurity at health systems across the country are painfully aware of the costs of unchecked external Internet attacks. Even still, many lack the expertise and technology to stop them, according to a new Ponemon Institute study.
For the report, “Security Beyond the Traditional Perimeter,” commissioned by BrandProtect, Ponemon garnered responses from 505 companies representing a wide range of industries. Ponemon said the number of responses makes it one of the most comprehensive investigative surveys to date on external threat awareness, costs, preparedness and mitigation.
U.S. capital markets were relatively flat for health IT and related sectors during the first half of 2016, according to a report from Healthcare Growth Partners, which provides investment banking and advisory services.
It counted197 venture capital deals, compared with 215 transactions during the first half of 2015. Deal sizes also were down.
The report also tracked stock indices for seven sectors when evaluating the performance of publicly traded companies: health IT, HIT services, pharmacy benefit management, healthcare services, contract research organizations, payers and payer services.
Low-income patients are eager to embrace mobile healthcare apps, but the majority say the tools are frustrating and nearly useless, finding data entry burdensome and gaining little use from the apps.
A new UC San Francisco study, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, revealed nearly every participant who used health apps could not get to a productive point. The respondents also were able to complete just 51 percent of data entry tasks and just 43 percent of them could access data from the tools.
The research involved patients at The Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (ZSFG), a UCSF partner hospital. Most were managing diabetes or depression, while come serve as caregivers.
While a majority of consumers say it’s important to have online access to their health information, a new survey finds racial and demographic differences effects who is offered such access.
In the study of 3,677 respondents, published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 92 percent considered online PHI access important, but just 34 percent were offered that access by a healthcare provider, and only 28 percent had accessed online PHI through a secure website or phone app.
While the researchers found no demographic differences in interest in online access, respondents reported it was offered less often to people who were older, non-white, Hispanic, less educated or had lower incomes. Geographic differences were also noted; groups living in nonmetropolitan areas and in the Northeast or South reported being offered portal access less often.
With the adoption of EHRs and patients' growing demand for access to information, the rate at which hospitals are offering electronic capabilities — and that patients are using them — has skyrocketed in the past three years. Where patients previously had to submit a formal request to a hospital's medical records department for a paper copy, patients are now taking advantage of the digitization of healthcare. For example, in 2015, 92 percent of hospitals offer patients the ability to view their medical records online, a significant increase from the 43 percent who offered the ability in 2013, according to an American Hospital Association report.
In other examples, 30 percent of hospitals allowed patients to download information from their medical record in 2013. That increased to 80 percent in 2014 and 84 percent in 2015. Thirty-five percent of hospitals allowed patients to request changes to medical records in 2013, growing to 71 percent in 2014 and 78 percent in 2015.
If someone locked down your pacemaker, what would you pay to regain control? If hackers took over a cockpit or locomotive, what would you pay for restitution?
This is the future of ransomware that we’ll almost certainly see if the evolution of these threats holds course. Any time human safety enters the mix, it’s a ripe opportunity to extort money. As more ransomware victims pay, the kind of threats that put lives at risk will be even more incentivized.
For now, though, it’s computers, data centers, and entire IT environments that are held hostage. While these threats are certainly not as grave as those against human lives, they can cripple businesses, health care facilities, and even government operations.
Healthcare IT funding reached $1.6B in 140 deals in the second quarter of 2016, representing a 33% increase compared to the $1.4B raised during the same period in 2015, according to a new report from Mercom Capital Group. Mercom’s comprehensive report covers healthcare IT and digital health deals of all sizes across the globe.
So far in the first half of 2016, close to $3 billion has been raised in 286 deals, a 50 percent increase compared to nearly $2 billion raised during the same period in 2015. The numbers are similar to the digital health funding reported by StartUp Health last week.
Only 16 percent of healthcare and pharmaceutical organizations have a formal process for monitoring the Internet and social media for external cyber threats.
In addition, just 26 percent of respondents in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry believe they have the tools and resources to analyze and understand external threats; 29 percent say they have the tools and resources to mitigate such threats; and 34 percent indicate that they have the tools and resources to monitor these threats.
Those are among the findings of a new survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute and sponsored by cybersecurity vendor BrandProtect. Specifically, respondents were surveyed about external cyber threats—those that arise outside an organization’s traditional firewall and security perimeter, and use online channels and use email, social media, mobile apps, or domains as their primary attack technology.