Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, March 28, 2011

It Looks Like iSoft Has Had It! Pity About That!

The following appeared this morning after an ASX announcement before market open this morning.

iSoft extends trading halt on buyout talk

  • Karen Dearne
  • From: Australian IT
  • March 28, 2011 9:44AM

SPECULATION that Australian health IT leader iSoft is on the market has intensified, with the company extending a two-day trading halt last week with a voluntary suspension until next Monday.

The trading halt was requested on Thursday pending a company announcement on its strategic review this morning.

Instead, the directors have told the Australian Stock Exchange the "current status and the proposals received as part of the review process, including relating to a potential change of control, are not sufficiently advanced to permit the disclosure of complete information to the market".

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/isoft-extends-trading-halt-on-buyout-talk/story-e6frgakx-1226029214374

The press release is here:

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9ODcyMTR8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&t=1

This looks very much like the end of iSoft as a stand-alone corporate entity.

If I had iSoft software operational in my organisation (eg HealthSMART in Victoria or the Macquarie Private Hospital in NSW) I would be checking contracts etc. pretty carefully!

It is a bit sad for OZ to loose its only major listed Health IT Company. The rest Global Health (ASX:GLH) and Promedicus (ASX:PME) are either unprofitable sinecures for their directors (GLH) or really so tiny that is it hard to see them making a major impact (PME). Anyone who remembers ICS will now know they have got out of the business.

HCN is, of course, now part or Primary Health Care (ASX:PRY) and it has been struggling with pathology price cuts in the last year or two.

The other significant health stocks really have only minimal Health IT exposure. (Sonic, Resmed, CSL)

The only reason to buy iSoft will be for the legacy revenue streams from maintenance. Rumours are CSC in the UK is interested! We shall see.

David.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Some Further Views on HL7 V3, A New Compliance and Testing Tool Offered and More!

A few days ago I had an e-Mail from Professor Barry Smith letting me know about a new post on his HL7 Watch Blog.

I was pleased to see our recent discussions and comments got a substantial airing.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

An Australian View on HL7 Version 3

The Australian Health Information Technology blog has posted here a valuable discussion of the item headed Cries for Help published earlier in these pages. This discussion is interesting not least because of the large number of contributions it contains which -- unusually -- are signed by their authors. It seems that, in Australia at least, there are individuals who are willing to commit themselves publicly to a critical position as concerns the HL7 project (where the vast majority of my US informants are willing to have their views communicated only anonymously).

As David More points out in his introduction to the discussion, the implementation success of V3 thus far (and this means after some 14 years of development work) "has been somewhat patchy, with at least some proponents scaling back their enthusiasm for full adoption of the V3 Standard as some see it is lacking the necessary robustness and internal consistency for ongoing use." Dr More goes on to point out that, "While I am not sufficiently across the details of some of this to be able to form a trustworthy opinion a number of very smart people I have chatted with have expressed similar concerns."

In a comment, Grahame Grieve writes on behalf of HL7:

There's no reason for anyone to be afraid to comment. HL7 is not a police state, and there's an endless list of people who criticise and carp. They can expect a vigorous in kind response, but nothing more.

v3/RIM is not perfect. But it's not intended to be an ontology of everything. If only Barry would understand. It's just a model that has some use for interoperability. It's got some go-down-with-the ship type supporters, of course.

As does v2 (and all the other standards - they all have the folks who are going to go down with the ship). It's not enough to say it's simpler. There's more to it than that. The discussion is being had elsewhere, and here is not the place for it. HL7 continues to produce v2 (v2.7 is coming) but the community that is HL7 is switching to v3 because of it's power.

v3 itself does have a patchy record. I'm on record as saying that there won't be another full v3 implementation. People will cherry pick the parts that work - like CDA - and use them as they want.

I've got more to say but it's starting to rain and I'm out in the bush camping. Have a good weekend."

Lots more here:

http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/2011/03/australian-view-on-hl7-version-3.html

A correspondent on the blog offered all sorts of interesting and provocative comments that followed on from the initial excerpt I have provided and makes some interesting points that are well worth browsing.

As I was digesting all this I noticed that Dr Eric Browne has also been busy.

Inching towards standardised pathology messages

2011-March-27 | 06:18 By: Filed in: exchange formatspathologyterminology

Fortunately, I’m now almost old enough to have forgotten the christmas pudding ritual – helping my father cut up the suet, spread out on sheets of newspaper on the dining room table. In those days, I was then already tall enough to also be able to peer down into the saucepan my mother used to boil clean the threepences and sixpences. And then when the pudding was finally mixed, it boiled away for hours and hours. The whole pudding making ritual seemed to take forever. All that effort for a minute morsel of pudding, that eventually arrived at the very end of an endless christmas lunch!

About this time last week, whilst reviewing the Australian Standards for pathology messaging, the smell of suet returned, reminding me of those yules of yesteryear. If, like me, your brain addles when presented with hundreds of acronyms squirming out from reams of paper, you may have some understanding of my state of mind. I really struggle when presented with bowls of suet that look something like this:-

MSH|^~\&|QDOC|HL7V1.1|AGFA|AGFA1AGFA|20051206150559||ORM^O01^ORM_O01|
00004848|P|2.4|||||||
PID|||QP-110||Norman^Harvey||19401009|M|||200^^E.ST ALBANS^^3021|ORC|SC||51205041^TGH|
|IP||^^^20051206150400^^R|||PALEX^^^^^^^^Q541||^Gasser^Rudy^^^^^^Q541|||||OPH^Ophthalmology^L|

(Apologies for the truncations!)

I thought that there had to be a better way for humans to deal with this – some easier way to interpret each arcane piece of HL7 v2 in context. I looked around, but could find nothing that met my requirements. So I have spent the past week writing an online message validator for Australian pathology messages. It is available at pathology.healthbase.info/hl7-test , and may be of some use to anyone dealing with pathology messaging, whether in the standards arena, or even if merely wanting to understand what some of the issues might be. There are a number of sample messages that can be explored. The validator also includes checking against LOINC and SNOMED terminologies.

More here:

http://blog.healthbase.info/?p=265

I think it is important that such a piece of altruism gets due publicity.

Last we had a ‘Cri du Coeur’ from an obvious expert lamenting the difficulties of the implementation of messaging standards (among other things) most especially in the Lab sector - and just how much pain and effort this was costing all involved.

Why is ‘IT’ all so hard in Pathology?

At the heart of a modern Pathology laboratory is a complex set of Information Technology (IT) systems that are critical to its operation. Users are often frustrated and disappointed at the difficulties they experience when systems fail, when requesting changes or seeking new IT functionality. Having worked in a number of industries before coming to Healthcare four years ago, I have tried to make some sense of why IT is so hard in Pathology.

We’re talking normal, run of the mill Pathology, not bio-informatics databases, leading edge cell imaging or shiny, ground breaking test developments. So why is it so hard to get some seemingly simple functionality from your IT Department? Why do all those small things that would make life a bit easier turn into long, drawn out projects that are around so long they become part of the family?

I'm sitting here at my desk massaging my temples. As the IT Manager, I've been handed the unenviable task of replacing the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), a job that will earn me no awards, applause or praise. We already know from past experience that it will be a difficult and traumatic project for my team as well as the whole organisation. We will grapple with new technology, interfacing and new ways of performing old processes. And for all that, we are not even expecting new functionality. We are not alone in this dilemma. At this time the IT managers of major Pathology providers in NSW, VIC, SA and WA are actively investigating replacing their LIMS. Some to modernise and consolidate, others, like ourselves, as a result of a pullout from the Australian market by a significant LIMS vendor. None will get any major new functionality. It may be easier to maintain, interface or get better reports, but it is unlikely that any new pathology breakthroughs will come as a direct result of these efforts.

Pages more here:

http://www.pulseitmagazine.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=511:why-is-it-all-so-hard-in-pathology

We are now over $350 Million and six years into the NEHTA experiment and still all this basic infrastructure messaging is not even agreed let alone actually implemented and operational in the way NEHTA is suggesting is vital.

Now I make no claims to fully understand what has and is going on here, but one has to suspect the award of a ‘gold star and Koala stamp’ for good behaviour to those involved is very unlikely.

Again we all know it is not beyond the wit of man to sort this out. What it is beyond is a National E-Health Governance Framework that is deeply dysfunctional and simply a fiasco.

To be clear the lack of leadership, governance and pursuit of an agreed strategy is just killing us!

We need to sort all that out and then with good will the rest can be sorted. This simply won’t happen in the present environment.

I recently had an e-mail from a colleague analysing the current motivators of the various actors. It was put this way:

  • DoHA – politics and money
  • NeHTA – power and self-preservation
  • SAI – cost mitigation
  • IT14 members (volunteers) – compromise, consensus, stubbornness

Until we have a break out of common sense and rationality the current situation will persist I fear!

David.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 26 March, 2011.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110316/NEWS/303169951/

HHS seeks to let states data-mine for fraud

By Maureen McKinney

Posted: March 16, 2011 - 4:15 pm ET

HHS' inspector general's office has issued a draft rule that would allow states to use federal funds to help identify instances of Medicaid fraud.

The proposed rule would amend a current HHS provision that prohibits state Medicaid fraud control units from using federal dollars to fund efforts to electronically sort claims looking for evidence of fraudulent practices.

In the rule, published in today's Federal Register, the inspector general's office notes that current restrictions force states to rely on referrals to investigate potential fraud. Also, the inspector general's office said, data-mining has proved to be an effective anti-fraud tool for the federal government.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/practice-outlines-real-time-costs-installing-ehrs/2011-03-17

Practice outlines real-time costs of installing EHRs

March 17, 2011 — 11:59am ET | By Janice Simmons

While there is no doubt that it will take much time and money to install electronic health records (EHRs) in physicians' offices, the question remains: How much will it all ultimately cost? A new analysis from the March Health Affairs from a primary-care practice in North Texas provides ideas about average costs.

The HealthTexas practice, affiliated with Baylor Health Care system, estimated that the total cost for implementation through the first 60 days after launch was $162,047 for a five-physician practice--with an average per physician total cost of $32,409. When adding in maintenance, the costs go up: Baylor researchers--looking for the whole first year after launch--estimated the total costs through the first year to be $233,297, with an average per physician cost of $46,659.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/senate-bill-looks-expand-ehr-use-mental-health-providers/2011-03-17

Senate bill looks to expand EHR use for mental health providers

March 17, 2011 — 11:56am ET | By Janice Simmons

A Senate bill calling for expanded health IT incentives for adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) by mental healthcare, behavioral healthcare, and substance abuse treatment providers and facilities was introduced this week by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).

"Mental healthcare is a critical component of our healthcare safety net, and allowing these providers access to cost-saving, quality-enhancing advances in health information technology will improve the care that millions of American receive," Whitehouse said in a statement.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/how-do-you-persuade-docs-make-switch-ehrs/2011-03-17

How do you persuade docs to make the switch to EHRs?

March 17, 2011 — 11:20am ET | By Janice Simmons

If you build it, will they (the physicians) come? It's a whole new field of dreams for hospitals--and the stakes are high. As hospitals spend millions on obtaining and installing electronic health records (EHRs) systems--with an eye toward getting a piece of the government's $27 billion in incentives for meeting Meaningful Use provisions--many are faced with the same quandary: how do they get physicians and other healthcare providers on board to adopt and effectively use the EHRs?

In a recently released survey from Dell of 150 hospital execs taken last fall, this issue seemed to be on their minds: when asked what technology challenges their hospitals faced, 79 percent said, "training clinicians and hospital staff in order to achieve process improvements and time savings." This response was second only to being able to afford and maintain the technology (cited by 85 percent).

-----

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/features/2011/could-fourth-time-be-the-charm-for-telehealth-bill.aspx

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Could Fourth Time Be the Charm for Telehealth Bill?

by Kate Ackerman, iHealthBeat Senior Editor

On March 8, Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) introduced a bill (S 501) that would create pilot programs to provide incentive payments to home health agencies that use telehealth technology to improve health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries and reduce spending.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) is a lead co-sponsor of the Fostering Independence Through Technology Act of 2011.

If you are getting a sense of déjà vu, that's for good reason. Thune introduced the same bill in 2005, 2007 and 2009, according to AshLee Strong, Thune's press secretary. None of the bills made it past the Senate Finance Committee. In addition, there was an amendment to include the FITT Act in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, "but it didn't get voted on because Democrats limited consideration of amendments," Strong said.

-----

http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/manitoba-off-and-running-with-e-health/142735

Manitoba off and running with e-health

The province has officially announced the first phase of its new e-health record system, which gives doctor’s access to patient demographic, immunization and drug data. Plus, analysis from e-health blogger Michael Martineau

By: Rafael Ruffolo

(17 Mar 2011)

The Government of Manitoba has officially launched the first phase of its new e-health record system at seven health centres and hospitals across the province.

The initial rollout of the eChart Manitoba system gives doctors the ability to view demographic, immunization and drug information. It also gives physicians access to select lab results.

Over the next 18 months, up to 30 sites will be phased into the project with a second phase of eChart expected to go live before the end of 2011. With that update, doctors will be able to get access to diagnostic imaging reports, allergy information and more lab data sources will be added.

-----

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/despite-incentives-doctors-are-wary-about-switching-to-electronic-health-records-/2011/02/24/ABvRCuV_print.html

Despite incentives, doctors are wary about switching to electronic health records

By Lena H. Sun, Monday, March 14, 8:03 PM

With funding and technical support from his employer, Washington internist Brad Moore made a swift transition to electronic records seven years ago. He now pulls up a patient’s chart with a few clicks of his mouse.

Lab tests show the man, a diabetic, has his blood sugar under control. A surgeon’s note describes progress after a shoulder operation. Before heading to the exam room, Moore, 47, clicks on a yellow “FYI” button, the electronic equivalent of a sticky note. It reminds him to ask how his patient is doing after his wife’s recent death.

About 20 miles away in suburban Maryland, internist Jonathan Plotsky hunts for the same kind of information in charts, some of them six inches thick, others taking up three volumes. He is well aware of the benefits of electronic records, but like most U.S. doctors, Plotsky, 56, is hesitant to switch. At up to $50,000 per clinician, the systems cost too much for him and the part-time doctor with whom he practices, he says. He doesn’t know what to buy, how to install it or how he would transition to paperless.

-----

Costs, Training Top Hospital EHR Concerns

While electronic health record adoption is high, only 47% of executives think IT will improve their work environment and 85% are worried about how to pay for it, finds Dell study.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

March 14, 2011

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229300903

Three out of four hospital executives say their organizations have partly or fully implemented electronic health records (EHRs) of some sort, and 83% have either selected or implemented an EHR that can fulfill federal meaningful use requirements, according to a survey conducted by Dell.

The Dell Executive & Patient Survey interviewed hospital executives as well as recent hospital patients in fall 2010 to gauge their attitudes toward various issues facing the healthcare industry.

The survey, which polled 150 hospital executives, also found that a third of respondents are participating in some form of local, regional, or state health information exchange (HIE), which allows multiple providers to have access to the same patient data. Another 54% are planning to participate in an HIE and almost 70% have partly or fully implemented an online physician portal.

-----

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/small-study-shows-virtual-doctor-visits-can-prove-effective/72508/

Small Study Shows Virtual Doctor Visits Can Prove Effective

It's up for debate whether Internet helps or hurts doctors' ability to treat patients. While sites like WebMD bring out the hypochondriac in us all, researchers out of a hospital clinic in Barcelona may have found a way that the Web and medicine can mesh. This week, they presented results of their telemedicine program "Hospital VIHrtual," which successfully treated HIV patients using an Internet-based home care system.

The team cared for 200 HIV patients over five years, providing consultations via the Internet. The results of the study show that the medical, psychological and pharmaceutical needs for the participants were met as satisfactorily as those required by in-person visitors.

The virtual hospital reduces the amount of face-time patients have with doctors, moving many routine doctor-patient interactions online. The program facilitates consultations via Webcam and e-mail; offers online medication management; provides access to accurate information about the disease, medications, side effects, news and innovations; and plugs patients into a virtual community, which connects them to health professionals and others who share their illness.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110316/NEWS/303169950/

White House calls for online privacy law

By Jessica Zigmond

Posted: March 16, 2011 - 5:00 pm ET

The Obama Administration is urging Congress to pass Internet consumer privacy legislation, and the issue was the subject of Senate Commerce Committee hearing Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

"Based on our review, we have concluded that baseline consumer privacy legislation will strengthen the U.S. Internet privacy framework for consumers and businesses alike," Cameron Kerry, general counsel for the Commerce Department, wrote in a department blog post Wednesday. “The Obama administration is committed to working with Congress to pass a bill that provides a stronger statutory framework to protect consumers' privacy interests in data that are collected and used or disclosed in commercial contexts in the Internet economy, while supporting innovation.”

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110316/BLOGS02/303169999/

Not so fast

Joseph Conn’s Blog

The HHS policy apparatus is beginning to signal—just a wee bit—that it may walk back its impossible and foolishly rushed timeline for enacting Stage 2 criteria for the meaningful use of electronic health-record systems. Here's what makes me think so:

Judy Murphy is a pioneer in nursing informatics and the vice president of information services at Milwaukee's Aurora Health Care. She also is a board member for the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. Of more importance, she's a member of the federally chartered Health IT Policy Committee's work group on meaningful use.

Murphy's work group generated 422 submissions to its request for public comments on its draft of proposed Stage 2 meaningful-use criteria it released in January. And in a meeting last week, the workgroup heard a preliminary report about the deluge of comments.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=76560

HRSA plans to revamp immunization systems, birth records

By Mary Mosquera

Monday, March 14, 2011

The Health Resources and Services Administration is looking to award grants for development of information systems that will support the exchange of maternal and child health information, such as immunizations.

HRSA’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau will focus on projects to expand the technical infrastructure to enable information exchange about immunizations across organizations that serve the maternal and child populations, and to develop electronic birth records.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=76541

NIH improves drug naming standard for EHRs

By Mary Mosquera

Friday, March 11, 2011

The National Library of Medicine has updated the RxNorm standard clinical drug vocabulary with more accurate and complete connections between national drug codes and standard non-proprietary names of medications recommended for use in electronic health records (EHR).

The vocabulary standard also includes for the first time the set of national drug codes from First DataBank, which provides drug databases that are widely used in the health care industry.

The additional content makes RxNorm more useful for healthcare providers, according to a March 8 announcement from the National Library of Medicine, part of the National Institutes of Health.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=76485

New survey shows EHRs benefit even small providers

By Mary Mosquera

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

A survey of studies from recent years shows that health information technology has benefited healthcare providers, even small practices, refuting other recent findings that suggest electronic health records and other health IT do not produce positive effects for patient care.

Previous studies focused on the early years of electronic health records (EHR) when functions were not as mature, according to one of the authors of the survey article, Dr. David Blumenthal, the national coordinator for health IT.

Furthermore, the survey found evidence of emerging measurable benefits for small practices in addition to the larger health IT leaders, such as Kaiser Permanente and the Veterans Affairs Department, which have been the source of much experience data in the past, he said at a March 8 briefing sponsored by Health Affairs journal to announce its latest published studies.

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-263693/When-Qualitys-a-Priority-so-is-HIT.html

When Quality's a Priority, so is HIT

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , March 15, 2011

Hospitals might be cutting back on spending, but they're still shelling out for electronic health records, according to a recent HealthLeaders Media Intelligence Report on capital spending. Among survey respondents, 39% said EMR systems will receive the majority of capital funds in the coming year. Another 27% say most of their capital funds will go to clinical technology this year.

An investment in health information technology is an investment in growth, Greg Pagliuzza, the vice president and CFO of Trinity Regional Health System tells senior finance editor Karen Minich-Pourshadi in the report.

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/acute-care/6720/bristol_shortlists_cerner_and_system_c

Bristol shortlists Cerner and System C

16 March 2011 Sarah Bruce

University Hospitals of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust has shortlisted System C and Cerner as part of its plans to implement a patient administration and electronic patient record system, eHealth Insider has learned.

The trust went out to tender last October and asked multiple suppliers to bid for a series of lots, inducing accident and emergency, operating theatres, maternity and a clinical portal.

In addition, the tender notice stated that the core PAS solution would be required to cover, among other functions, “patient registration, inpatient care, waiting lists, out-patients, coding, casenote tracking, bed management clinical data collection, referral to treatment pathways, Choose and Book compliance, audit reports.”

-----

http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/primary-care/6719/emis_gets_eps_r2_approval_for_emis_web

EMIS gets EPS R2 approval for EMIS Web

15 March 2011 Fiona Barr

EMIS has announced that it has become the first system supplier to receive full roll-out approval for Release 2 of the Electronic Prescription Service, for its EMIS Web system.

The accreditation has come more than 20 months after the first site for EPS R2 went live, and follows a decision earlier this month to stop any more primary care trusts from taking part because of problems with system availability.

Three system suppliers - TPP, INPS and EMIS - have been involved in first of type deployments in the eight practices and 30 pharmacies which are using EPS R2.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/medical-identity-theft-rise

Medical identity theft on the rise

March 15, 2011 | Mike Miliard, Managing Editor

IRVINE, CA – A new study from the Ponemon Institute, sponsored by Experian, finds that almost 1.5 million Americans are victims of medical identity theft – an increase from last year. While consumers grasp the importance of protecting their medical and personal information, it reports, few take the precautions to avoid medical ID theft.

The study also found that the average cost to resolve a case of medical identity theft stands at $20,663 – up from $20,160 in 2010.

-----

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/security/health-net-discloses-loss-of-data-to-19-million-customers

Health Net discloses loss of data to 1.9 million customers

HealthNet is notifying some 1.9 million customers that personal and health data may have been contained on drives that were found missing from a data center in California.

By Jaikumar Vijayan | Framingham | Wednesday, 16 March, 2011

Health Net, a provider of managed health care services, yesterday said that it's alerting some 1.9 million customers that nine server drives containing personal and health data were recently discovered missing from a data center in Rancho Cordova, Calif.

The data center is managed for HealthNet by IBM, which notified the insurer about the missing drives, HealthNet said in a statement.

An initial probe has found that the missing drives contained names, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial information and health data of current and former Health Net members, employees and health care providers, the statement said.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/joint-venture-including-ama-subsidiary-offers-web-based-services-doctors/2011-03-09

Joint venture including AMA subsidiary offers web-based services to doctors

March 9, 2011 — 6:35pm ET | By Ken Terry

A subsidiary of the American Medical Association is teaming up with Covisint--a technology vendor that has been helping the association develop a physician portal--and my1HIE, a health information exchange operated by several Michigan IPAs, to give Michigan physicians access to a range of cloud-based health IT applications.

The AMA subsidiary, Amagine, and its partners will offer doctors interoperable IT products and tools such as electronic health records, e-prescribing and online continuing medical education materials. The idea is to help physicians select an EHR, show meaningful use for federal health IT incentives, and collaborate with colleagues online, regardless of what system they're using.

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/new-medical-home-accreditation-guidelines-emphasize-health-it/2011-03-10

New medical home accreditation guidelines emphasize health IT

March 10, 2011 — 2:15pm ET | By Ken Terry

Four medical societies have released a new set of guidelines for organizations accrediting patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) that are more specific about health IT considerations than their original joint statement on the medical home concept, which came out in 2007. The societies that issued the guidelines are the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians and the American Osteopathic Association.

Whereas the 2007 statement simply called for information technology to be "utilized appropriately" in support of PCMH goals, the new guidelines recommend: "Recognition and accreditation programs related to the patient-centered medical home should actively work to align their standards, elements, characteristics, and/or measures with the meaningful use criteria [for government health IT incentives]."

-----

http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/when-will-doctors-and-patients-connect-online/2011-03-12

When will doctors and patients connect online?

March 12, 2011 — 5:48pm ET | By Ken Terry

Patient portals have become more important to healthcare providers because of their desire to show meaningful use of electronic health records. But there's a disconnect with patient care: While clinical summaries are being made available to satisfy a meaningful use requirement, and some providers supply lab results to patients via portals, there's little emphasis so far on information exchange between doctors and patients. The predominant use of patient portals is still for appointment and refill requests and online bill payments.

A similar disconnect exists in the realm of personal health records (PHRs), which are growing rapidly but are still used by only 10 percent of the population.

Last year, the California Healthcare Foundation conducted a survey of PHR users. About half of respondents said they preferred to have a PHR provided by their physician. Aside from trust in their doctors, this seems to indicate they'd like to have some real clinical data in their PHRs. But, according to a new report from consulting firm CSC, the electronic health record--the most likely source of such data--is also the least prevalent source of information in today's PHRs. Moreover, none of the current PHRs met CSC's definition of a true PHR, which includes accurate and complete data from all care settings.

-----

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700118229/University-of-Utah-Health-Care-gives-patients-on-the-go-access-to-medical-records.html

University of Utah Health Care gives patients on-the-go access to medical records

Published: Sunday, March 13, 2011 9:04 p.m. MDT

SALT LAKE CITY — No more anxiously waiting on hold for a doctor's office to make an appointment, refill a prescription, check test results or ask a question. All of that can now be done on-the-go.

MyChart — an iPhone, iPad, iTouch application that provides easy access to medical records — made its local debut Thursday, to anyone who is a patient within the University of Utah Health Care system of hospitals and clinics.

"We just view this as another opportunity to put the patients first in terms of care and to be able to provide additional services for patients that make receiving and monitoring their care more and more convenient," said Rob Lloyd, executive director for the U.'s ambulatory services and community clinics.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/health-information-exchange-framework-42135-1.html

Framework Evaluates HIEs

HDM Breaking News, March 11, 2011

The Center for Health Information and Decision Systems at the University of Maryland has created a framework to assist in developing sustainable health information exchanges.

The CHIDS HIE Evaluation Framework includes a methodology for assessing any HIE on five performance measures: value creation and sustainability of a business model; organizational structure and decision making processes; technology; community engagement; and trust in the system.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20110309/NEWS/303099988/

Boston researchers develop app platform

By Joseph Conn

Posted: March 9, 2011 - 11:45 am ET

Federally funded researchers at Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School have released a healthcare interoperability platform and interface "to support a flexible health information technology environment and promote innovation," according to a news release.

Development work on the platform was funded through a $15 million grant from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology for its Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects, known as the SHARP initiative.

Announced last year, the SHARP program provided a total of $60 million in grants to fund research in four areas—security and health IT at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; patient-centered cognitive support at the University of Texas at Houston; secondary use of EHR data at the Mayo Clinic; and healthcare application and network design, the research area of the latest effort by Children's Hospital and Harvard.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/cios-enchanted-cloud-lack-metrics-justify-investment

CIOs 'enchanted' by cloud, but lack metrics to justify investment

March 10, 2011 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

SEATTLE – Although most CIOs are anticipating making significant investment in private and public cloud technologies over the next 12 months, they currently report they are not tracking the "fundamental metrics" required to make the case for ROI.

The survey, titled IT Survey on Cloud Computing, Virtualization, and IT Financial Services, was conducted by Apptio, a provider of on-demand Technology Business Management (TBM) solutions, in partnership with the Worldwide Executive Council (WEC), a research firm that facilitates dialogue between executives and Wall Street investors. WEC interviewed 100 U.S. CIOs from firms representing a broad range of vertical industries, including healthcare and technology.

The survey reveals that the majority of IT decision makers don't have the necessary metrics to build an intelligent business case for moving applications and infrastructure components to the cloud. Moreover, the vast majority of those surveyed indicated that they neither possess the ability to track utilization nor are they able to recover these costs via "chargeback" or "showback" methods, further complicating their ability to calculate ROI for the business.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/physician-network-secure-messaging-doximity-42128-1.html

New Network for Docs Launched

HDM Breaking News, March 10, 2011

Doximity Inc., a start-up company has launched a free secure information network for physicians.

The official launch starts with a community of 7,000 physicians on the network as it has been in beta since October 2010. The network now is available to all physicians and supports iPhones, iPads and Android devices in addition to being accessed via a personal computer. Jeff Tangney, co-founder of drug reference content software vendor Epocrates Inc., is CEO of San Mateo, Calif.-based Doximity.

-----

Enjoy!

David.