Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Saturday, November 05, 2011

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 5th November, 2011.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care

October 27, 2011

Arnold Relman

The US is facing a major crisis in the cost of health care. Corrected for inflation, health expenditures in the public sector are nearly doubling each decade, and those in the private sector are increasing even more rapidly. According to virtually all economists, this financial burden, which is now consuming about 17 percent of our entire economic output (far more than in any other country), cannot be sustained much longer. The federal share, including payments for Medicare and Medicaid, was 23 percent of the national budget in 2009 and is a prime cause of the deficit.1
There is no current prospect of raising taxes. If the federal long-term debt is to be reduced, government health expenditures on Medicare and Medicaid must be controlled. However, there is no agreement in Washington on how that can or should be done. Both parties claim to have the answer but, as I will make clear, no initiatives proposed by either party have much chance of significantly slowing the rise in federal health costs without reducing access to needed services. Major reform will be required, but that is not even under consideration. In any case, health legislation is currently stalled by a bitter political deadlock. No initiatives to improve health care will come out of Congress until after the 2012 elections and, unless the results are unexpectedly decisive, probably not even then. Still, as I will explain here, there is a chance that new developments in the way physicians are organizing themselves to deliver care might improve the currently dismal prospects for action on major reform and cost control.
-----

Q&A: Blumenthal Talks EHRs, Healthcare Reform

President Obama's former national coordinator for health IT, Dr. David Blumenthal, shares his thoughts on progress with meaningful use of electronic health records, and what's next for healthcare reform.
By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee,  InformationWeek
October 26, 2011
During his two-year stint as National Coordinator of Health IT, Dr. David Blumenthal oversaw the development and implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's $27 billion HITECH Act stimulus programs to encourage the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic health records by hundreds of thousands U.S. hospitals and clinicians. Blumenthal--a former primary care physician at Massachusetts General Hospital--left his Office of National Coordinator job in April to return to his tenured post at Harvard. InformationWeek Healthcare senior writer Marianne Kolbasuk McGee caught up with Blumenthal at the recent Partners Healthcare's Connected Health Symposium in Boston.
-----

How Text Messages Could Change Global Healthcare

There are now more than 5 billion mobile phone subscribers, and 90 percent of the world’s population is covered by a cell signal. Josh Nesbit, the 24-year-old CEO of Medic Mobile, is on a mission to use these far-reaching networks to change how patients and doctors interact. Can low-tech SMS programs revolutionize global health?

By Chris Sweeney
Josh Nesbit sees a bright future for the cellphones that most of us see as antiquated. The 24-year-old Nesbit is the CEO of nonprofit Medic Mobile, and this startup exec’s vision is to take those chunky Nokias and other phones of the recent past—the kind that most Americans threw out or relegated to the junk drawer long ago—and use them to radically change how health care is delivered in developing nations.
These old phones don’t have the touchscreens and slick software features of our shiny new smartphones. But they can text, and in Nesbit’s eyes, a simple technology like text messaging is a tool that can be used to track disease outbreaks, help first responders quickly locate victims after disasters, and more.
-----

Health information technology: Keep it simple

Making electronic record-keeping systems easier for health providers to use can help prevent dangerous or even fatal mistakes, says the draft of a project [3] by the National Institute of Standards and Technology [4] (NIST).
The draft, titled “Technical Evaluation, Testing and Validation of the Usability of Electronic Health Records,” is available for informal public comment until Nov. 10, 2011. It provides guidance from NIST, a technical research agency within the Department of Commence, for testing electronic health record-keeping systems to make sure they are understandable for health care practitioners. The draft was released last month.  
One of the aims of simplifying the devices is to avoid potentially dangerous medical errors, says the report. At the moment, though, there is no government agency specifically directed to regulate or enforce the safety of the devices being sold to medical offices.
-----

EHR Market To Reach $6.5 Billion By 2012

Hospital EHR adoption is expected to expand significantly as advanced systems are implemented to meet Meaningful Use criteria, a Frost & Sullivan study says.
By Nicole Lewis,  InformationWeek
October 21, 2011
Total market revenue for electronic health records (EHRs) is expected to hit $6.5 billion in 2012, which is more than a sixfold increase from the $973.2 million posted in 2009, a study from Frost & Sullivan predicts. The rise in EHR revenues is primarily due to new licensing and upgrades as hospitals get their EHR systems ready to meet Meaningful Use requirements.
The new report, U.S. Hospital EHR Market, 2009-2016: Charting the Course for Dramatic Change, found that today's IT infrastructure at many hospitals is very different from 2009 when approximately 12% of hospitals were using what could be considered either a basic or advanced EHR, and only 2% of those hospitals were using EHRs in a way that would qualify for Meaningful Use.
-----

MGMA: Overnight EHR roll-outs aren’t effective

Written by Justine Cadet
October 25, 2011
LAS VEGAS—If EHRs are going to be optimized to increase efficiency and the bottom line, administrators should consider more inclusivity in the implementation process, staff and physician workflows, training time and a phased-in implementation, according to an Oct. 24 presentation at the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) 2011 annual conference.
While implementing an EHR, “think inclusively,” encouraged presenter Ron Anderson, of CHMB, which provides technology and business services for healthcare providers. He said this involves bringing all the stakeholders to the table—both internally (front office, back office, management and providers) and externally (patients and outside resources, such as labs, device manufacturers, hospitals and business service vendors).
-----

Cerner Reports Third Quarter 2011 Results

Record Revenue, Bookings, Earnings and Cash Flow

KANSAS CITY, Mo., Oct 27, 2011 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) -- Cerner Corporation CERN +1.88% today announced results for the 2011 third quarter that ended October 1, 2011, delivering record levels of bookings, revenue, earnings and cash flow.
Bookings in the third quarter of 2011 were $650.3 million, an increase of 31 percent compared to third quarter 2010 bookings of $495.7 million. Bookings were an all-time high for a third quarter and the second highest result in company history.
Third quarter revenue was $571.6 million, an increase of 24 percent compared to $462.7 million in the year-ago period.
-----

mihealth™ Consumer Health Application Achieves Infoway Certification

Assures product built according to National privacy and security standards
October 27, 2011 (Toronto, ON) - Canadians are one step closer to having secure access to their personal health records as mihealthTM achieves Infoway certification, announced Richard Alvarez, President and CEO, Canada Health Infoway (Infoway).
"I congratulate Mihealth Global Systems Inc. for having their mihealthTM consumer health application successfully complete the Infoway certification process," said Alvarez. "The mihealthTM application was assessed to show that it complies with national privacy and security requirements."
The application will receive the Infoway certification mark, which demonstrates Mihealth Global Systems Inc.'s leadership and commitment to national standards and best practices.
-----

Survey: Hospitals Have High Hopes for Information Exchanges

HDM Breaking News, October 27, 2011
A survey of more than 340 hospitals finds almost 80 percent have or plan to join a health information exchange.
Thirty-two percent of respondent hospitals already are part of an HIE while 47 percent plan to join such an initiative. The primary driver toward HIE is meeting electronic health records meaningful use criteria, cited by 48 percent of respondents. Other reasons include connecting to the community (21 percent), connecting to impatient/ambulatory environments (15 percent), connecting to the state (12 percent) and driving toward accountable care organizations (2 percent).
-----

Culture 'stumbling block' to revolution

26 October 2011   Rebecca Todd
The greatest challenge to making the health service information-driven is cultural, not technical, a new report has suggested.
The report commissioned by BCS Health canvassed the views of NHS and non-NHS organisations on the current state of health information practices.
Of 232 respondents to an online survey, 170 (73%) said the “organisational culture within the NHS” was a “major” or “almost insurmountable” challenge to making the health system information driven.
-----

EHR Worst Practices

Just a partial list of EHR snafus emphasizes the need for a better system of tracking errors.
By Paul Cerrato,  InformationWeek
October 26, 2011
We need the equivalent of the National Transportation Safety Board to monitor EHRs, according to Dean Sittig, PhD, a member of the faculty at the School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center. After listening to his presentation at this week's American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Scientific Sessions, I can see the wisdom of that suggestion.
NTSB was launched in 1926, when the automotive industry was in its infancy and few people thought about all the fatalities that lie ahead. Over the years, it has been responsible for insisting on speed limits, seatbelts, airbags, and a host of other invaluable safety measures.
An NTSB-like organization for EHRs would at the very least provide a reporting mechanism to keep track of incidents and life-threatening consequences of misusing e-records. More importantly, it could police vendors and healthcare providers who repeatedly ignore these dangers.
-----

Electronic Records May Increase Malpractice Lawsuit Risk

EHRs may reduce medical liability for some errors, but could create new forms of medical liability and expose existing liability issues, says report.
By Neil Versel,  InformationWeek
October 25, 2011
The rapid movement toward electronic health records (EHRs) may unwittingly raise physician risk for malpractice lawsuits and push liability insurers to raise their premiums, a new report suggests.
EHRs may reduce the medical liability for certain errors, but it appears they "both create new forms of medical liability and expose existing liability issues in the healthcare environment that might otherwise remain unknown," says a white paper published by the AC Group, a Montgomery, Texas, health IT research and consulting firm.
The paper calls on federal officials to slow the pace of the federal Meaningful Use incentive program to get medical practices and hospitals to use EHRs. Co-authors Mark Anderson, CEO of the AC Group, and veteran clinical informatics professional Dr. Larry Ozeran say the "artificially short deadlines" for implementation could raise malpractice risks by spurring vendors to cut corners on developing products and rushing users through training.
-----

Aurion Open Source HIE Software Upgraded

HDM Breaking News, October 24, 2011
The Alembic Foundation has released version 4.1 of its Aurion open source health information exchange software.
Aurion 4.1, downloadable here, is a private-labeled and enhanced version of the federal government's Connect software. The foundation last spring released version 4.0 of Aurion with multiple long-standing bugs fixed and additional functionality. This included the adding of "multiple assigning authority" to better identify organizations and information systems participating in HIE.
-----

Health IT Wins More Venture Capital in 2011

Venture capital for healthcare software and IT services hit $207 million in the third quarter of 2011, a 14% increase compared to Q3 2010.
By Nicole Lewis,  InformationWeek
October 25, 2011
Venture capital investments in companies that provide health IT and services hit $207 million in the third quarter of 2011, a 14% increase when compared with the $182 million raised during the same period last year, new figures from Dow Jones VentureSource reveal.
The latest figures, which were published Friday, also show that the health IT and services sector has raised $445 million for the first three quarters of this year and could possibly surpass the $508 million invested in all of 2010.
VC investment in medical software and services is "trending nicely," said Jessica Canning, global research director for Dow Jones VentureSource. "Given the momentum that the industry has already seen over the past year and a half, we'll most likely see a fairly significant increase in deals in the fourth quarter, bringing us above the 2010 level."
-----

4 best health IT innovations within the past year

October 24, 2011 | Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
New health IT was anywhere and everywhere in 2011, promising ways to streamline data and increase patient care. Now, with even more technology on the cusp of the mainstream market, it’s only natural to wonder what’s the best.
That’s why we asked Ahmed Ghouri, MD, co-founder and CMO of Anvita Health, what he believes were the most influential new technologies within the past year and what will be game changers in the years to come. “If you look at the stages of healthcare we’re going through, the first is structural, which includes CPOE, EMRs, and health information exchanges," said Ghouri. “So data management in storage, and data exchange. I think once we solve the structural problems, it will be like creating a Web browser; dramatic value is created once everyone is on the Internet. It’s not just getting online, but also doing things with the data online.”
-----

Mostashari: 'Never going to be easier than now' to tackle ACO, EHR, ICD-10

October 25, 2011 | Eric Wicklund, Contributing Editor
To all those healthcare CIOs out there worried about ICD-10, meaningful use, accountable care organizations, patient-centered medical homes and a host of other government-backed efforts to reform healthcare, Farzad Mostashari, MD, has some words of advice: Don’t stay on the sidelines.
In other words, the Department of Health and Human Services’ National Coordinator for Health Information Tehnology says, “it’s never going to be an easier time than now” to adopt an electronic health record, meet meaningful use guidelines and move toward an ACO.
-----

AHIMA members make case for hospital chief knowledge officer position

Don Fluckinger, Features Writer
Published: 24 Oct 2011
The hospital medical records department is evolving from a paper-based repository to a digital knowledge base giving rise to more compliance and data-mining requirements. Specifically, the accountable care organization (ACO) model and a growing number of other quality-based payer incentive programs require data mining. Compliance with HIPAA privacy requirements, not to mention legal e-discovery requests, point to the need for more than just a CIO to implement and secure IT infrastructure.
All these tasks add up to what other service sectors and industries call knowledge management, headed by the chief knowledge officer (CKO). Health care organizations have been slow to embrace the hospital CKO position, but ACOs and other emerging data initiatives point toward the need for it, said Cindy Zak, health information management (HIM) director and privacy officer at Milford (Conn.) Hospital. She made her case for the chief knowledge officer in a presentation at the American Health Information Managers Association's 83rd AHIMA Convention and Exhibit.
-----
October 24, 2011

Survey reveals reasons doctors avoid online error-reporting tools

By Vanessa Wasta, Johns Hopkins Medicine
Too busy and too complicated. These are the typical excuses one might expect when medical professionals are asked why they fail to use online error-reporting systems designed to improve patient safety and the quality of care. But Johns Hopkins investigators found instead that the most common reasons among radiation oncologists were fear of getting into trouble and embarrassment.
Investigators emailed an anonymous survey to physicians, nurses, radiation physicists and other radiation specialists at Johns Hopkins, North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System in New York, Washington University in St. Louis and the University of Miami, with questions about their reporting near misses and errors in delivering radiotherapy. Each of the four centers tracks near misses and errors through online intradepartmental systems. Some 274 providers returned completed surveys.
-----

A new age of biosurveillance is upon us

By Gregory Goth
Created 2011-10-23 10:29
The CDC will overhaul BioSense in November, amid a wave of new data-sharing tactics rolling in from other fields that promises to bolster surveillance methods and architectures.
Krista Hanni doesn't consider herself an expert on the latest developments in IT-enabled syndromic and biosurveillance, but she does recognize that a groundswell of change is about to hit the discipline.
“We're at the beginning of a new field here,” said Hanni, the surveillance and preparedness manager for the Monterey County, Calif., Public Health Department. “That’s what we’re running into.”
The traditional epidemiological approach, which helps public health officials deal in an authoritative but delayed manner with outbreaks and disease caused by calamities, is being challenged by new forms of data and new approaches using methodologies from other fields.
-----

4 data breach response best practices

October 24, 2011 | Rick Kam, President and CEO, ID Experts and Christine Arevalo, director of healthcare identity management, ID Experts
We’ll be honest. This is not another article about the details of data breach response—notification timelines, identity protection, remediation, and so forth. Data breaches are stressful events, and experience proves that such details are best handled by an expert third party. Instead, we’ll focus on the framework, or set of best practices in which to place these details — the how of a data breach response.
Most healthcare providers have their patients’ well-being at heart, and it’s this attitude of caring that can help an organization achieve compliance almost automatically. These best practices can help organizations demonstrate that goodwill in tangible, effective ways.
-----

Love of Health Tech Doesn't Have to be (Double) Blind

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , October 25, 2011

One of my favorite quotes from last week's Center for Connected Health Symposium in Boston came from Peter Tipett, MD: "Information technology can reduce cost, increase quality, and advance science," said the vice president of industry solutions and security practices at Verizon's business unit. "But other than that it's not worth it."
In so many ways, so many kinds of Health IT make perfect logical sense. Making patient medical records easily accessible in electronic format? A no-brainer. Giving patients access to their own records which, after all, belong to them? Makes sense.  Tools that help clinicians make quick and accurate evidence-based diagnoses at the point of care? Well, of course that's a good idea.
But try proving it.
There is some research suggesting that electronic health records can have a positive impact on quality. But for medicine, so enamored with empirical evidence, double-blind studies, and peer review, it isn't always enough. Telemedicine, remote health, and m-health are particularly vulnerable to that phrase that concludes so many academic papers: "more research must be done."
-----

EMIS Web installations put back

25 October 2011   Rebecca Todd
A number of GP practices waiting for EMIS’ next generation system, EMIS Web, will have to wait until after the New Year.
EMIS says it has delayed some GP installations to allow it to focus on issues such as training needs for new users.
EMIS Web will enable primary, secondary and community clinicians to view and contribute to a patient’s core GP record.
At the end of August, it had been installed at 228 GP practices and the company had taken 1,130 orders for the system.
-----

Research finds GP e-prescribing errors

25 October 2011   Shanna Crispin
New research has found that more than 4% of electronic prescriptions written by general practitioners contain errors.
Researchers from Reading University have been studying prescription data from 15 general practices over the past 18 months and are on the verge of publishing the results.
Lead researcher, Dr Rachel Howard, presented preliminary results at a forum on electronic prescribing held in London.
She said the research found that 4% of the prescriptions had “significant clinical errors” and another 0.9% had errors relating to the monitoring of medicines.
-----

SCR clocks up over 9m records

21 October 2011   Linda Davidson
There are now over nine million summary care records available for use in urgent and emergency care in England, the Ascribe User Conference heard this week.
Dr Emyr Wynn Jones, secondary care clinical lead for the SCR and HealthSpace programmes at Connecting for Health, told the conference that the milestone was passed on 18 October.
He said the SCR programme had suffered a ‘lot of collateral damage’ from the recent announcements about the demise of the National Programme for IT, with some people mistakenly thinking that the SCR was being abolished.
-----

Global CTOs call for faster progress on e-health standards

By Emeka Aginam
No fewer than 21 Commonwealth Telecommunications Organizations (CTOs) from leading companies in the information and communication technology (ICT) industry  rose up from a meeting yesterday in Geneva at the  ITU Telecom World 201 urging  the International Telecommunications Organization, (ITU)  to accelerate technical standardization work in the field of e-health.
According to CTOs reliable, interoperable standards  were  key to providing patients and health professionals with the means to utilize remote consultation services, advanced ICT-based diagnostic procedures and electronic health information services.
The meeting among other things agreed that international coordination on standards will be vital, and that growth in telemedicine services will also demand aggressive roll-out of broadband networks.
-----

HIT Barriers to Patient Engagement Persist

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , October 24, 2011

The correlation between accountable care models and healthcare information technology that connects and engages patients permeated conversations at The Center for Connected Health annual symposium in Boston last week.
As news of the final rules broke, participants weighed the importance of electronic health records in a successful ACO business model. And panelists at two sessions discussed accountable care's merits and pitfalls, touted the model's potential to make healthcare more connected and participatory, and warned that many barriers still stand in the way to patient engagement.
Midday Thursday, the first day of the conference, came word that the federal government had released final ACO regulations with major concessions to the original plan. One of the critical changes: The rule no longer requires that 50% of participating physicians be meaningful users of electronic health records.
-----

Final ACO rule holds great possibilities for health IT

October 22, 2011 — 6:06pm ET | By Ken Terry
Compared with the draft rule on accountable care organizations (ACOs) that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued last March, the final rule has made it significantly easier for ACOs to qualify for the Medicare shared savings program in the area of health IT. What CMS has done, in effect, is to recognize that healthcare organizations are in a variety of stages on their road to electronic perfection. Yet that doesn't mean that the less technologically advanced groups aren't trying to provide accountable care that lowers costs and raises quality.
-----
Monday, October 24, 2011

Federal Health IT Activity Heats Up in Q3 2011

During the third quarter of 2011, the federal government continued to implement the HITECH Act, which was enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This update summarizes key developments and milestones between July 1 and Sept. 30. 
-----

ACO Rule Gives Patient Control Over Data Sharing

HDM Breaking News, October 21, 2011
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services officials, in a final rule establishing the Medicare Shared Savings/ACO program, stuck to their guns on enabling beneficiaries participating in an ACO to opt-out of letting their claims data be shared.
"Although we have the legal authority, within the limits described previously, to share Medicare claims data with ACOs without the consent of beneficiaries, we nevertheless believe that beneficiaries should be notified of, and have control over, who has access to their personal health information for purposes of the Shared Savings Program," according to the final rule issued on Oct. 20. "Thus we proposed to require that, as part of its broader activities to notify patients that its ACO provider/supplier is participating in an ACO, the ACO must also inform beneficiaries of its ability to request claims data about them if they do not object."
-----

CDW: Healthcare sector to lead IT spending

October 20, 2011 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor
VERNON HILLS, ILL – In the midst of economic uncertainty, IT decision-makers in the healthcare industry report expected growth in overall IT budgets and hiring, according to the latest CDW IT Monitor.
While the latest wave of the CDW IT Monitor noted numerous fluctuations among sectors and industries surveyed, the comprehensive figures indicate that, on the whole, IT sentiment is holding steady. The Six Month Growth Outlook, which measures long-term anticipated investment, decreased one point from June, to 67, and was unchanged from one year ago.
 “Despite ongoing economic uncertainties, the overall outlook remains relatively stable,” said Neal Campbell, senior vice president and chief marketing officer, CDW. “This shows that while IT decision-makers are evaluating and scrutinizing their investments, they are still spending, especially in areas such as software and security."
-----

Emergency Room Patients Tracked With RFID Tags

EHR vendor Meditech is integrating its system with Awarepoint's tracking software for better emergency care.
By Neil Versel,  InformationWeek
October 21, 2011
Awarepoint, a San Diego-based vendor of real-time location systems (RTLS) for healthcare environments, will integrate its technology with Meditech's enterprise electronic health record (EHR) in an effort to improve throughput and patient safety in hospital emergency departments.
The partnership combines Awarepoint's awareEDtracker system with the EHR's ED management module, known as Meditech EDM. As patients present in a hospital's ED, they are registered in the EDM, then given radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags so awareEDTracker can find them. The RTLS technology also records patient interaction with physicians and other ED staff, who wear tracking tags, too.

-----
Enjoy!
David.

Friday, November 04, 2011

How A Less Than Robust Password Can Cause A Lot of Trouble!

The following article appeared a few days ago.

Hacked!

As email, documents, and almost every aspect of our professional and personal lives moves onto the “cloud”—remote servers we rely on to store, guard, and make available all of our data whenever and from wherever we want them, all the time and into eternity—a brush with disaster reminds the author and his wife just how vulnerable those data can be. A trip to the inner fortress of Gmail, where Google developers recovered six years’ worth of hacked and deleted e‑mail, provides specific advice on protecting and backing up data now—and gives a picture both consoling and unsettling of the vulnerabilities we can all expect to face in the future.
By James Fallows
On April 13 of this year, a Wednesday, my wife got up later than usual and didn’t check her e‑mail until around 8:30 a.m. The previous night, she had put her computer to “sleep,” rather than shutting it down. When she opened it that morning to the Gmail account that had been her main communications center for more than six years, it seemed to be responding very slowly and jerkily. She hadn’t fully restarted the computer in several days, and thought that was the problem. So she closed all programs, rebooted the machine, and went off to make coffee and have some breakfast.
When she came back to her desk, half an hour later, she couldn’t log into Gmail at all. By that time, I was up and looking at e‑mail, and we both quickly saw what the real problem was. In my inbox I found a message purporting to be from her, followed by a quickly proliferating stream of concerned responses from friends and acquaintances, all about the fact that she had been “mugged in Madrid.” The account had seemed sluggish earlier that morning because my wife had tried to use it at just the moment a hacker was taking it over and changing its settings—including the password, so that she couldn’t log in again.
Pages and pages follow here:
The saga outlined in the next 10+ pages is riveting and salutatory read and has all sorts of lessons about retrieving information from the cloud, password strength, the need for backups in different locations and so it goes on.
I know my key passwords are now even more robust after reading this than they were!
A great read!
David.

Thursday, November 03, 2011

Health IT Seems To Be Racing Ahead in the US On All Fronts. Wonderful What Leadership and Money Can Do!

The following popped into view a few days ago.
Monday, October 24, 2011

Federal Health IT Activity Heats Up in Q3 2011

During the third quarter of 2011, the federal government continued to implement the HITECH Act, which was enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This update summarizes key developments and milestones between July 1 and Sept. 30. 
Third-Quarter Health IT Highlights
The third quarter of 2011 saw a number of high-level developments:
  • ONC Releases Final Health IT Strategic Plan. On Sept. 12, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT released a final version of its Federal Health IT Strategic Plan for 2011 through 2015. The plan focuses on five goals: 1.) achieve adoption and information exchange through meaningful use of health IT; 2.) improve care and population health and reduce health care costs through use of health IT; 3.) inspire confidence and trust in health IT; 4.) empower individuals with health IT to improve their health and the health care system; and 5.) achieve rapid learning and technological achievement.
  • HHS Secretary Appoints New OCR Director. On Sept. 13, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced the appointment of Leon Rodriguez as director of the Office for Civil Rights. Among other things, OCR is responsible for enforcing the HIPAA privacy and security rules.
  • President Obama Proclaims National Health IT Week. President Obama issued a proclamation declaring Sept. 11 through Sept. 16 National Health IT Week. The proclamation urged Americans to learn more about the benefits of health IT, take action to increase adoption and meaningful use of health IT and use the information health IT provides to improve the quality, safety and cost effectiveness of health care.
ONC Policy, Standards Committees
Health IT Policy Committee Submits Meaningful Use Stage 2 Appendix to ONC
.....
Other Health IT Policy Committee Recommendations
.....
Health IT Standards Committee Recommendations
At its September meeting, the Health IT Standards Committee approved recommendations put forward by the Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN) Power Team for technical specifications and standards to support the secure transport and exchange of electronic health information on a national scale through NwHIN and the Direct Project. 
At its August meeting, the committee approved the Surveillance Implementation Guide Power Team's report on standards for health IT-based surveillance systems for population health. 
Also in August, the Standards Committee endorsed the Clinical Quality Measures Workgroup and Vocabulary Task Force joint recommendations on the assignment of code sets to clinical concepts for the purpose of reporting clinical quality measures. 
The recommendations outline the minimum set of vocabulary standards that should apply to each data element included in the 23 categories of clinical concepts defined by the National Quality Forum's Quality Data Model version 3.0. The committee sent the recommendations to ONC on Sept. 9. 
EHR Certification
.....
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
.....
Health Information Exchange
ONC Launches Two Metadata Initiatives
In September, ONC launched two initiatives to test health information exchange metadata standards under its Standards & Interoperability Framework:
ONC soft launched the Data Segmentation Initiative, which builds on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology recommendation that metadata tags be developed and used for health information exchange. The goal of the initiative is to enable health providers to segment and withhold certain data from exchange. The initiative formally launched Oct. 5.
ONC launched its Query Health Initiative, a public-private collaboration that will establish standards and services for distributed population queries of data in EHRs. ONC is seeking participants for three Query Health Workgroups: the Business Workgroup, the Clinical Workgroup and the Technical Workgroup. 
ONC Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Metadata Standards
On Aug. 5, ONC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking soliciting public comments on metadata standards to support health information exchange. The ANPRM outlines standards for patient identity metadata (i.e., data required to uniquely select a patient from a population), provenance metadata (i.e., data that provide information on a dataset's history, origin and modifications) and privacy metadata (i.e., data to convey and communicate patient preferences regarding the sharing of his or her health information). Comments were due Sept. 23.
ONC Releases NwHIN Transport Specifications
On Aug. 12, the ONC Office of Standards and Interoperability announced that NwHIN transport and security specifications were available for public review and comment. ONC held two public calls to discuss the specifications in August. Comments were accepted until Sept. 16.
Privacy and Security
.....
Rural Health IT
.....

MORE ON THE WEB

An amazingly large amount more is found here!
The scope and range of activity in just a single quarter is really amazing - and flags just how determined the US is to actually move on with all this.
I will leave it as an exercise for the reader to compare this level of progress and activity with what we are presently seeing in Australia.
David.

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

The Evidence For Health IT - Some Still Doubt and We Really Lack Proper Trials. Time To Do Them I Believe!

The following very interesting article appeared last week.

Love of Health Tech Doesn't Have to be (Double) Blind

Gienna Shaw, for HealthLeaders Media , October 25, 2011

One of my favorite quotes from last week's Center for Connected Health Symposium in Boston came from Peter Tipett, MD: "Information technology can reduce cost, increase quality, and advance science," said the vice president of industry solutions and security practices at Verizon's business unit. "But other than that it's not worth it."
In so many ways, so many kinds of Health IT make perfect logical sense. Making patient medical records easily accessible in electronic format? A no-brainer. Giving patients access to their own records which, after all, belong to them? Makes sense.  Tools that help clinicians make quick and accurate evidence-based diagnoses at the point of care? Well, of course that's a good idea.
But try proving it.
There is some research suggesting that electronic health records can have a positive impact on quality. But for medicine, so enamored with empirical evidence, double-blind studies, and peer review, it isn't always enough. Telemedicine, remote health, and m-health are particularly vulnerable to that phrase that concludes so many academic papers: "more research must be done."
Another of my favorite nuggets from the symposium was when Joseph Kvedar, MD, founder and director of the Center for Connected Health, said researchers add that line to the end of their papers because it's in their best interest—they are, after all, in the business of conducting said research.
Tippet noted that it's not just a healthcare thing—there's very little science about the efficacy of technology in any field. Did Watt need empirical evidence before patenting the steam engine? Did Sony do double blind studies to see if consumers would rather listen to music on a Walkman instead of lugging a boombox around on their shoulders? Did the healthcare industry need peer reviewed studies of imaging technology such as CT-scanners when they were new?
Oh, wait. Scratch that last example.
OK, so there are some healthcare technologies that demand rigorous study. But do text messages reminding patients to take their medication at the correct time each day fall into the same category? What about wireless scales that send a patients' weight to their doctor's office? An app that helps overweight patients make healthy food choices or gives tips to folks trying to quit smoking?
Again, back to the symposium. In a debate-style session, Kvedar and Sahid Shah, CEO of the health IT consultancy Netspective who blogs under the handle The Healthcare IT Guy, debated whether current approaches to patient self-management improve quality or lower healthcare costs.
More here:
This is a real ripper of a debate and we need to have it globally. There are applications that we know work, those we imagine will work and those where the jury is well and truly out!
We know in good quality trials that if you present helpful information to a clinician at the point of decision making care you can see a positive improvement in what people do as they treat patients. On the broader question of just how these trials translate into the clinic and how much they improve patient outcome - to say nothing of the overall cost of care - I think - except for a few isolated examples - we are still struggling.
Bringing it closer to home the PCEHR is simply an ideological fantasy. There is no evidence anyone has shown me that it will make a whit if difference to the quality and safety of scare.
Just what is Government scared of? Actually conduct a proper trial with a real PCEHR system and show it actually makes a difference to patient outcomes - or admit to the public you are a money wasting rabble who just ignores the concept of seeking evidence when you have a pre-conceived idea something will work!
You say the science of climate change is in - and I agree - so we should act - but on the PCEHR it is just not true. You can’t have it both ways! Without any evidence the PCEHR is an astonishing fraud on the Australian public.
David

I Think NEHTA Should Read This Closely. It Might Help Save on Staff Turnover Costs. Certainty On Other Matters Is Also Needed!

The following popped into view a few days ago and reminded me of the astonishing staff turn-over rates (28-30% per annum) that seem to prevail at NEHTA - according to the CEO as Senate Estimates a little while ago.

5 ways to attract the best health IT employees

October 27, 2011 | Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
Implementing the latest health IT is a challenge in and of itself, but having a competent team makes it that much easier. Fred Pennic, senior advisor with Aspen Advisors and author of the blog Healthcare IT Consultant, suggests five ways to attract the best health IT employees. 
1. Having a strong employer brand and culture. According to Pennic, top IT prospects are attracted to companies with a well-established and respected brand that also coincides with their own personal brand. "Employers must continue to establish and/or maintain a strong brand that will attract the best HIT talent,” he said. 
2. Creating a positive work environment. “All employees want to work and thrive in a positive working environment,” said Pennic. Not to mention, a healthy environment helps reduce employee turnover rate, while negative and destructive environments tend to upset employee morale. “[That] will motivate top HIT talent to leave for better opportunities,” he added. “Let’s face it, no one wants to work for a negative superior who never provides any positive feedback.” Ensuring top talent is rewarded and recognized for their accomplishments and efforts is also key, said Pennic. 
3. Offering career development opportunities. To retain the best IT employees, it’s essential employers continue to keep them engaged. “[This should be] what the employees feel is ‘meaningful work,’” said Pennic.
.....
4. Ensuring flexibility.
.....
5. Providing competitive compensation, incentives, and benefits.
.....
More here:
It would seem to me that point number three needs to be looked at closely here. Feedback I get suggests that the combination of a drop dead date as of July, 2012 and a lack of early reassurance that an ongoing job will materialise must be weighing a little. Also the lack of any apparent progress on all sorts of fronts for a long while and now a mad rush with ‘tiger teams’ can’t be helping!
It is utterly incompetent on the part of NEHTA’s senior management and even more importantly the NEHTA Board to not have had this totally sorted long since.
There are over 200 people who work with NEHTA and it is fair to say they all deserve much greater clarity and consideration than is presently apparent.
A look here will show that COAG meetings (to get funds approval) seem now to be few and far between.
There was one in 2010 and so far 2 in 2011. With the last one at the end of August, 2011 and with the last Parliamentary Session happening this week (The Reps rise on Nov 24, 2011 with 3 extra days in the following week - if required - for the year) on wonders if they will all be waiting until the end of the ‘silly season’ for some clarity.
This is also, complicated by the fact that there is no funding for the PCEHR committed after a one microsecond go live on July, 1 2012. If the PCEHR folds where does that leave the associated NEHTA staff?
Everyone needs a great deal more clarity I would suggest!
David.

Marking A Small Milestone. 300,000 Site Visits

Just thought it was worth a one line note!
Thanks to all who have made it so - now for 500,000!
David.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Why Has This Just Not Been Done After Six Years of Trying? It Is Just A Joke!

The following report appeared in the Australian very recently.

Victoria builds database of health products

HEALTH Purchasing Victoria will spend $2.1 million building its own database of health products and suppliers, as state governments struggle to implement the National Product Catalogue intended as a single source of data.
The NPC has been a key priority for the National e-Health Transition Authority since 2006, as all the jurisdictions recognise the costs associated with hospitals using different catalogues and non-standardised data.
NeHTA says the NPC now contains more than 210,000 items from 360 suppliers, and all of the states have been accessing data; the aim is to create a single source of product master data for medicines, medical devices and other healthcare requirements.
Victoria's auditor-general, Des Pearson, last week found the state's central health procurement agency was at least two years' away from completing its database of suppliers and purchasing data, the Victorian Product Catalogue.
"HPV struggles to get consistent and comparable data from hospitals to help identify future opportunities and plan for tenders on its annual program," Mr Pearson said.
"This problem largely stems from lack of a common product catalogue across the sector.
"Hospitals maintain separate catalogues and identify the same products in different ways, making it very difficult for HPV to get reliable data on how much is being spent in each product category.
"The lack of comparable data and standard names and products were identified as issues in 2005."
The report says HPV has been developing a VPC since 2009, in line with the state's commitment to the NPC being established by NeHTA, but had not been adequately funded for the task.
This year, it was given "in principle" approval for funding by the Health department.
"The VPC will synchronise data between the NPC and the various systems for managing catalogues, setting common, accurate product and pricing data, reducing management effort in health services and enabling broader supply chain reform," the HPV says.
"Full implementation of the VPC across the health services could occur by December 2013 and deliver savings of around $2.9 million per year."
Initial software development is estimated to cost $600,000 in year one, rising to $950,000 a year, from year three onwards; software licensing costs are an estimated $100,000 annually.
More here (on NSW being similarly slow!)
One really can only one question on all this. Why, when there is actual demonstrable money to be saved, can’t NEHTA and the various State Jurisdictions just get this work done and operational. I have been hearing about this being needed since the late 1980’s. I wonder who is paying whom to prevent this happening and the savings being realised. It can hardly be incompetence that extends over a 30 year period - it has to be something else - plain old corruption maybe?
It must be that the suppliers clearly do not want it to happen, for their own profit motives, and that somehow they have caused it not to happen and pricing arbitrage remains alive and well for their benefit!
David.